博客
关于我
死锁案例之九
阅读量:117 次
发布时间:2019-02-25

本文共 3032 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

MySQL Deadlock Analysis Case Study

1. Introduction

Deadlocks, in general, are a fascinating yet challenging technical problem that most DBAs and developers encounter during their careers. This article will walk through a series of case studies to help those interested better understand deadlocks in MySQL environments.


2. Case Analysis

2.1 Business Scenario

A development team encountered a deadlock issue while initializing data. Their approach involved batch inserting multiple records into a table with a unique constraint. The unique constraint caused deadlocks due to adjacent values being inserted in sequence.

2.2 Environment Setup
  • MySQL Version: 5.6.24
  • Transaction Isolation Level: RR (Read Committed)
2.3 Technical Details

The table tc has the following structure:

CREATE TABLE `tc` (    `id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '自增ID',    `c1` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',    `c2` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',    `c3` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',    `c4` tinyint(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',    `c5` tinyint(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',    `created_at` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '1970-01-01 08:00:00',    `deleted_at` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '1970-01-01 08:00:00',    PRIMARY KEY (`id`),    UNIQUE KEY `uniq_cid_bid_dt_tid` (`c1`, `c2`, `deleted_at`, `c3`),    ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=19 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4)

3. Deadlock Log Explanation

The deadlock log reveals the following:

  • Session 2 (T1): Attempting to insert two records with the same c1 and c2 values but different c3 values.
  • Session 1 (T2): Inserting a record that conflicts with Session 2's unique constraint, leading to a deadlock.

  • 4. Deadlock Causes

    4.1 Insert Statement Lock Mechanism
    • Stage 1: Unique constraint check requires a shared lock (S) and an ordinary lock (ORDINARY).
    • Stage 2: After inserting, the system applies a gap lock (INSERT_INTENTION) to prevent adjacent insertions.
    • Stage 3: Finally, it acquires an exclusive lock (X) and a record lock (REC_NOT_GAP).
    4.2 Compatibility Matrix
    • Shared (S) and Exclusive (X) locks do not conflict.
    • Gap (GAP) and Next-Key (S Next-key) locks block insert intentions.
    • Record (REC) and Next-Key (S Next-key) locks conflict.
    • Existing locks (REC, GAP) do not block new locks.

    5. Deadlock Resolution

    Deadlocks caused by concurrent inserts can be challenging to resolve at the SQL level. However, some strategies include:

    • Adjusting the order of operations: Simplify the insertion logic to reduce concurrency.
    • Modifying the unique index: Distribute initial data evenly across the table to avoid adjacent conflicts.

    6. Conclusion

    The deadlock in this case arises from concurrent inserts of adjacent records due to unique constraints. The system's lock mechanisms, particularly the Next-Key Lock, create a cycle of waiting transactions, leading to deadlock.


    7. Extended Reading

    For further understanding of MySQL deadlocks and lock mechanisms, we recommend exploring:

    • InnoDB transaction isolation levels
    • Deadlock prevention strategies
    • Index optimization techniques

    转载地址:http://qpn.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    pdo sqlserver
    查看>>
    SpringCloud实战(十一)-更优的分布式配置解决方案(Apollo)
    查看>>
    PDO中捕获SQL语句中的错误
    查看>>
    SCP和SFTP相同点和区别
    查看>>
    SpringCloudAlibaba中使用Sentinel实现熔断降级之熔断策略详解
    查看>>
    peek和pop的区别
    查看>>
    Pelemay 项目教程
    查看>>
    Penetration Testing、Security Testing、Automation Testing
    查看>>
    Pentaho业务分析平台 SQL注入漏洞复现
    查看>>
    PentestGPT:一款由ChatGPT驱动的强大渗透测试工具
    查看>>
    PeopleTools 8.54 first install note
    查看>>
    PEP 8016 获胜,成为新的 Python 社区治理方案
    查看>>